In the Gulf region, the United States’ close Arab allies are gradually moving toward direct involvement in the ongoing conflict with Iran. Their firm stance is largely driven by repeated attacks impacting their economies and concerns over Iran’s potential control of the strategic Strait of Hormuz.
Recent measures have further strengthened U.S. military capabilities, particularly in terms of airstrike operations, while simultaneously increasing pressure on Iran’s economy. Although these Gulf states have not yet publicly deployed their forces, the situation could change rapidly.
Reports indicate that Saudi Arabia recently allowed the U.S. to use its strategically located King Fahd Air Base in the western part of the country. Earlier, Riyadh had stated it would not permit its facilities or airspace for military action against Iran. However, Iran’s retaliatory attacks on Saudi energy infrastructure and the capital city forced a shift in that stance.
Analysts suggest that Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman is now moving toward a new strategic approach and is reportedly close to deciding on direct military participation. Multiple sources indicate that Saudi Arabia’s entry into the conflict is now a matter of time.
Saudi Foreign Minister Faisal bin Farhan has also warned that the country’s patience with Iran’s attacks has limits, emphasizing that any assumption of Gulf states’ inability to respond is incorrect.
Meanwhile, the United Arab Emirates (UAE) has already begun strict measures against Iranian assets and institutions, closing several Iran-linked entities and warning of potential asset seizures in the future. These steps could further restrict Iran’s international trade and foreign currency access.
In Dubai, several key Iranian establishments, including hospitals and social clubs, have been shut down. Authorities confirmed these institutions are no longer operational, citing legal violations as the reason for closure.
For years, the UAE has served as a major financial hub for Iranian business and investment. The current measures, however, represent a stricter posture that could significantly impact Iran’s economy.
While Gulf states officially claim they will remain out of direct military action, the actual situation suggests otherwise. Verified sources indicate that some attacks have involved support from within the Gulf region.
Iran’s assertive control measures in the Strait of Hormuz pose a major threat to international trade, including shipping restrictions and selective passage for certain vessels. There have even been reports of discussions about levying tolls in the waterway.
Iran’s attacks on key energy facilities in the region continue to intensify, targeting airports, refineries, and luxury infrastructure. The UAE alone claims to have thwarted thousands of attacks.
In this context, Gulf leaders are pressuring the United States to take more decisive action, insisting that Iran’s military capabilities must be fully neutralized to restore regional control.
Recent attacks have highlighted the limits of U.S. security guarantees and diplomatic efforts. Countries including Qatar view these assaults as direct threats to national security.
There is also a growing sense of frustration across the Arab world. Despite long-term security partnerships and significant U.S. investments, Gulf states have limited influence over Washington’s decisions.
The current escalation is also part of a cycle of retaliatory attacks. Many of Iran’s strikes in the Gulf region are seen as revenge for earlier Israeli attacks on Iranian energy facilities.
Overall, the situation has reached a point where U.S. allies face a harsh reality. They risk being drawn into a conflict in which their own control over events is extremely limited.
Experts note that weaker states often find themselves trapped in conflicts when aligned with a stronger ally, even if they initially do not wish to participate. The current scenario is a clear example of this dynamic.
Gulf US allies including UAE, Saudi Arabia on the verge of war against Iran
